tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8631624812585403362.post5838926634865344669..comments2009-08-22T14:28:37.433-07:00Marcus J. Careyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07441426999698326334noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8631624812585403362.post-56603086761911310262009-04-20T02:55:00.000-07:002009-04-20T02:55:00.000-07:00People that are trained and choose not to comply need to be punished. You may have to fire a couple of users to get the point across. It doesn&#39;t matter what pay bracket they are still punished. That will improve security for sure.Marcus J. Careynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8631624812585403362.post-62047147037203415292009-04-20T01:32:00.000-07:002009-04-20T01:32:00.000-07:00hmmm...I agree there is no such thing as a stupid user, however how is it going to change? <br>User often say &quot;I dont need to know that&quot; or &quot;im not paid to know that&quot; or even harder, try to take it in and cant.<br>Its like the old saying &quot;a person is clever but people are stupid&quot;<br>Security is always the weakest link.<br><br>you also have some pay brackets where the user is not interested and sometimes lack the cognitive ability to get it.<br><br>Calling someone or people stupid is not technical correct but often the end result is the same.Roggynoreply@blogger.com